Menu
After months of uncertainty and controversy, Bob Dylan finally accepted the 2016 Nobel Prize in literature at a jovial, champagne-laced ceremony on Saturday, the Swedish Academy announced.
The academy, which awards the coveted prize, ended prolonged speculation as to whether the 75-year-old troubadour would use a concert stopover in Stockholm to accept the gold medal and diploma awarded to him back in October.
They were handed to Dylan at a “private ceremony in Stockholm” attended by 12 academy members, Sara Danius, the academy’s permanent secretary, said in a blog post. “Spirits were high. Champagne was had,” she confided.
Read more
“Quite a bit of time was spent looking closely at the gold medal, in particular the beautifully crafted back, an image of a young man sitting under a laurel tree who listens to the Muse,” she added. “Taken from Virgil’s Aeneid, the inscription reads: ‘Inventas vitam iuvat excoluisse per artes,’ loosely translated as ‘And they who bettered life on earth by their newly found mastery’.”
The first songwriter to receive the prestigious award, Dylan joins a celebrated group of laureates including Thomas Mann, Samuel Beckett, Gabriel Garcia Marquez and Doris Lessing.
The meeting took place at a secret location before Dylan’s first concert in Stockholm, the first stop on a long-planned European tour for his latest album of cover songs, Triplicate. His second concert is on due on Sunday.
Dylan had not been expected to deliver his traditional Nobel lecture at the meeting – the only requirement to receive the eight million kronor (837,000 euros, $891,000) that comes with the prize.
Bob Dylan: Triplicate review – sensitive and exquisite 30-song extravaganza
Read more
He has until 10 June to provide his lecture, which could be anything from a short speech to a performance, a video broadcast or even a song. Failing that, he risks losing the prize money. “The Academy has reason to believe that a taped version will be sent at a later point,” Danius said on Wednesday.
Several Academy members, including Danius, were present at the concert as Dylan, wearing a white hat, western-style black blazer and cowboy boots, performed Love Sick and Full Moon And Empty Arms, part of a playlist of standards and self-penned hits.
His performance was met with a cheering crowd, which gave repeated standing ovations, especially when he played a harmonica. Dylan was tightlipped between songs and made no mention whatsoever about the Nobel prize.
Lars Sjoblom, a 65-year-old sound and light technician, said he had grown up with Dylan’s music but was “greatly surprised” he had not said anything. “I came here to listen to what he had to say about the Nobel Foundation and to the Swedish people,” Sjoblom said. “I think he could have shown Sweden the respect to say ‘thank you’.”
Bob Dylan criticised as 'impolite and arrogant' by Nobel academy member
Read more
But Dag Hanners, a 65-year-old logistician, said Dylan never speaks with the crowd during performances. “You just have to live with that,” he said with a chuckle.
Dylan was honoured “for having created new poetic expressions within the great American song tradition,” the Nobel committee said when the award was announced last October.
“Not once have I ever had the time to ask myself, ‘Are my songs literature?’” Dylan said in a thank-you speech read out by the US ambassador to Sweden during the December Nobel ceremony in Stockholm. Mail app keeps crashing windows 10. He skipped the event due to “pre-existing commitments”.
Dylan kept silent for weeks after he was announced as the winner and when he was asked at the time why he did not respond to the Academy’s calls, he told Britain’s Daily Telegraph: “Well, I’m right here.” His mysterious reaction even provoked Academy member Per Wastberg to call him “impolite” and “arrogant”.
Dylan later apologised for not being able to attend the ceremony and expressed surprise over being chosen for an honour given to literature heavyweights such as Ernest Hemingway and Albert Camus.
“If someone had ever told me that I had the slightest chance of winning the Nobel Prize, I would have to think that I’d have about the same odds as standing on the moon,” he added.
I did this as an essay for school, but I thought it would be nice to put this in here. Not really expecting anyone to read it, but maybe some of you might agree or disagree. I just think this song is a good topic of discussion so feel free to weigh in on it. Thanks ?
If you haven’t listened to this song, here is a link.
Bob Dylan’s “The Times They Are A Changin’” is a classic, timeless work of art that plays as an anthem for change. Inspired by Irish and Scottish ballads, the universal, message-filled lyrics are coupled with great folk music in the background. The song makes me think about how those who choose stay in the past must keep up because times are changing.
The song opens with a harmonica and guitar playing the melody. Though this might not be what Dylan intended, I interpreted it as a patriotic tone on top the of the classic folk sounds. The first stanza perfectly sums up what the song is all about. As Dylan asks the people of the world to “admit that the waters around [them] have grown,” he means that change has arrived. He says that if people don’t accept and embrace change, they’ll drown in the past. It’s interesting to note that this was written in 1964 considering the tension between the past and the present. At the time, the Civil Rights Movement was at its peak and anti-war sentiments in the midst of Cold War tensions were going strong. I think Bob Dylan is trying to show that with all this call for change, those who wish to maintain the culture of the past will eventually fall because the new movements are growing at a fast rate.
The folk atmosphere provides a simple rhythm that Dylan repeats in the second stanza, but he shifts his attention from everyday people to writers and journalists. He calls for those who prophesize with their pens to take careful note of change for when the times are changing, you never know what can happen. Since the “wheel’s still in spin,” meaning that a lot change is still happening, Dylan explains that “the loser now will be later to win” so this is the time for journalists and writers to watch the world with sharper eyes. This is a universal idea that applies to journalism, and we see it every day. Surprising events happen all the time and modern journalists should try their best to foresee them since once they happen, time cannot be reversed.
The third stanza focuses on politicians, who are tasked with answering to the will of the people. As Dylan points out, unfortunately, many senators and congressmen only work in their own best interests. When the people demand change, Dylan points out that the congressmen cannot “stand in the doorway” or “block up the hall.” Though I think the opening stanza is the best one, this one comes in a close second because of how truth-revealing it is. Bob Dylan shows that the stalling politicians will ultimately be the ones who lose in the end because the demand for change (the raging battle outside as Dylan puts it) near the doors of Capitol building will eventually overpower even the strongest of politicians.
The last group of people that Dylan addresses consists of parents. In the fourth stanza, he reminds parents that the children are the future. Since times are changing, parents don’t really have a say in criticizing what they don’t understand. He says that parents should not attempt to send their children on the path of the dusty, aging old road for their lives are unpaved. It’s the sons and daughters who must forge the new road, and if parents don’t want to help, Dylan argues that they should “get out.” This is Dylan’s stance on cultural change. It’s controversial due to the argument that parents want what’s best for their children and sometimes their “best” is different from that of the children. Though it’s difficult to see where the line is drawn, I would interpret Dylan’s lyrics as applicable to only the parents who don’t want their children to make their own lives. For that reason, I wholeheartedly agree with him. Parents who hinder the decision making processes of their children really stand in the way of the future. Every child has dreams and aspirations, and every time that a parent stands directly in the way of a dream, the future grows less bright. I know it’s not a popular opinion among parents since many dreams are farfetched and risky, but true greatness often comes from taking risks.
The last stanza shows the universal and perpetual nature of change. Dylan notes that the change of the present will soon be the past. Power struggle in relationships. All the things he said earlier will soon apply to what we know as the present. It’s weird to think about life as this fast, linear movement of time, but it is. Though I’m young now, I’ll be old soon and the thing that will keep me going is change. If I don’t embrace change at all stages of life, I too will “sink like a stone.” Dylan poses this existential question of accepting change to everyone.
In my opinion, “The Times They Are A Changin’” is the best Bob Dylan song, and it’s one of my favorite songs ever because of the messages that it conveys (which is funny since I’m not a fan of folk music). From its memorable melody to its universal lyrics, the song perfectly sums up why Bob Dylan wrote music. Like many artists, he too had something to say about the world, and this song is his response to the ubiquitous change around him.
Twitter: @MohitPuvvala
Instagram: @MohitPuvvala
Advertisements
'Last Thoughts on Woody Guthrie' | |
---|---|
Poem by Bob Dylan | |
from the album The Bootleg Series Volumes 1-3 (Rare & Unreleased) 1961-1991 | |
Released | March 26, 1991 |
Recorded | April 12, 1963 |
Genre | Spoken Word, Poetry |
Length | 7:08 |
Label | Columbia |
Songwriter(s) | Bob Dylan |
'Last Thoughts on Woody Guthrie' is a poem written by American singer-songwriterBob Dylan, and recited live during his April 12, 1963 performance at New York City's Town Hall.[1] It was released in 1991 on The Bootleg Series Volumes 1-3 (Rare & Unreleased) 1961-1991 after circulating on bootleg releases for years, even appearing on the ten-LPbox setTen of Swords in 1985.
History[edit]
Dylan's performance at the Town Hall on April 12 was used to debut several new compositions, such as 'Tomorrow Is a Long Time', 'Dusty Old Fairgrounds', 'Ramblin' Down Thru the World', and 'Bob Dylan's New Orleans Rag'.[2] However, at the end of the concert, Dylan returned to the stage to recite one of his poems in public, 'Last Thoughts on Woody Guthrie', which he has never done since.[1] In his introduction, Dylan explained that he had written the piece after being asked to 'write something about Woody..what does Woody Guthrie mean to you in twenty-five words' in the impending release of a book about Guthrie.[2] He then explained that he 'couldn't do it -- I wrote out five pages and.. I have it here..Have it here by accident, actually'
The poem is essentially an analysis of hope. Dylan sets the scene by describing the stressors of everyday life and the myriad of challenging choices we have to make. These stimuli can, essential, cause us to feel alone, lost and without hope. Dylan then explains the function of hope and how we need something to give our lives meaning. He then finishes the poem by suggesting that Woody Guthrie is as much a source of hope and beauty in the world as God, or religion.[3]
References[edit]
- ^ abBauldie, John, (1991) Linear notes to The Bootleg Series Volumes 1-3
- ^ abBjorner (May 21, 2010) New York City, New York, April 12, 1963 Bjorner's Still on the Road. Retrieved August 16, 2010
- ^Last Thoughts on Woody Guthrie (Bob Dylan). woodyguthrie.de. Retrieved August 18, 2010
Bob Dylan Poems Worksheets For Kids
External links[edit]
- Lyrics at bobdylan.com
Retrieved from 'https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Last_Thoughts_on_Woody_Guthrie&oldid=882544057'